IND V AUS 2020: ‘We are masters at trying to find a loophole in the rule for our own advantage’ – Sanjay Manjrekar chips in on concussion substitute controversy

India’s decision to bring in leg-spinner Yuzvendra Chahal as a concussion substitute for Ravindra Jadeja in the first T20I against Australia has evoked mixed reactions from various quarters of the cricketing circle.

While Indian legend Sunil Gavaskar found nothing wrong with India’s move, another ex-India cricketer, Sanjay Manjrekar, was more skeptical over what transpired in the Indian camp after Jadeja’s injury and the move to bring in Chahal as the concussion substitute.

Speaking after the first T20I, Manjrekar opined that the Chahal-Jadeja incident might prompt the ICC to have a re-look at the ‘concussion substitute’ rule, and make some changes as well.

“Really happy that he (Chahal) got that opportunity and I think Virat also was very honest to accept that as fate turned out, they had a better bowled than somebody who might have not been able to bowl his four overs. Chahal was a huge bonus and thank god India went to 160 that it all became possible,” Manjrekar said on ‘Extraaa Innings’ Show on Sony Sports Network.

He, however, added, “But now, after this, there’s going to be a lot of thought given to the concussion substitute, the whole concept purely because we as players – all of us – there are rules made with good intention but we are masters at trying to find a loophole in the rule for our own advantage. Whether India took an advantage, we don’t know, but there’s something the ICC needs to start looking at, so that one team doesn’t get such a massive advantage.”

During his superb knock of 44 not out from 23, Jadeja was struck on the helmet in the final over by a delivery from Pat Cummins. The left-hander, however, batted on till the end of the over. He did not look concussed but started limping towards the end of the innings, which added fuel to fire to the theory that India misused the concussion substitute rule by bringing in Chahal for Jadeja.

Some former cricketers also pointed out the breach of protocol as no physio came out on the field to check on Jadeja after he was hit on the head.

Australia’s coach Justin Langer was visibly upset with India’s decision to use Chahal as a concussion substitute and was seen having an animated discussion with match referee David Boon over the issue.

As things would turn out, concussion substitute Chahal claimed 3 for 25 and ended up as the man of the match. India clinched the first T20I by 11 runs to go 1-0 up in the three-match series.

India and Australia will now meet on Sunday in the second T20I in Sydney. Jadeja has been ruled out of the remaining T20Is owing to the concussion he suffered while batting in the first T20I. Medium-pacer Shardul Thakur comes in as his replacement.

Related Articles

IND v AUS 2020: Moises Henriques questions Yuzvendra Chahal being Ravindra Jadeja’s ‘like-for-like’ replacement

Australian all-rounder Moises Henriques was baffled by team India fielding Yuzvendra Chahal as a concussion substitute for Ravindra Jadeja. Playing a quickfire knock of 44*, Jadeja helped India reach a competitive total of 161-7 in their 20 overs in the first T20I at Canberra. However, he was struggling with a hamstring injury and was also hit on the helmet by a short-pitched ball from Mitchell Starc.

IND vs AUS 2020: A ‘great feeling’ to help India win the first T20I, says Yuzvendra Chahal

Yuzvendra Chahal was the Man of the Match as India beat Australia in the first T20I to take a 1-0 series lead. The leg-break bowler wasn’t named in the initial playing XI but replaced Ravindra Jadeja as a concussion substitute for Australia’s innings. He led team India to victory, picking up the three crucial wickets of Aaron Finch, Steve Smith, and Matthew Wade.

Responses

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *